I've been using ChatGPT, for several months, and have found it quite helpful. However, what I don't like, is the "ransom" mentality of the platform.
This happens quite often with commercial software. You find a product that is useful. So, you incorporate it into the work that you do. After a while, it becomes indispensable to your work. That's when that product is able to hold your work ransom. You have to pay for that product, and continue paying for it or some sort of subscription, otherwise, your work can't continue. That's when that company is able to increase their prices, because they know you have to pay it, in order for you to continue your work.
Open-source projects, like Linux, have recognized this tactic, long ago. Which is why Linux exists.
For these reasons, I'm trying to find a way to develop a local, stand-alone alternative to ChatGPT, that will allow me to use AI, without being beholden to the company that provides it.
I've read about PrivateGPT. However, the consensus is that it's not as good as ChatGPT. When I asked Google what it would take, in order to make it as good as ChatGPT, it provided an answer. However, I'm not an AI expert. Because of this, such implementation may be beyond my experience level.
How practical would it be for me to pay someone to perform a one-time setup, so that I could have a local AI that's as good as ChatGPT? I have a few servers, and would be willing to invest in more hardware, if necessary. However, I'm wondering how practical this is. Is it practical for me to pay someone to set up PrivateGPT, in such a way that it would be as good as ChatGPT? Have others done this?